By Yuri van Hoef

With corruption scandals coming to light in December 2013, Istanbul’s Taksim square once again became the site of major anti-government protests. Earlier, in May 2013, what started as a small environmental protest against the demolition of parts of the park, quickly escalated into full-blown protests against the government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his Justice and Development Party (AKP).

Supported by Turkey’s main opposition party, the secular Republican People’s Party (CHP), the protests were particularly aimed at Erdoğan’s aim for a constitutional reformation, in which he aims to add executive powers to the currently mostly ceremonial Turkish presidency (an office Erdoğan himself hopes to attain in the future). Further dissatisfaction focuses on his earlier reforms, such as the prohibition of selling alcohol in the evening and Turkey’s more involved foreign policy, which takes the country farther away from the secular principles of founding father Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.

The continued rejection of membership of the European Union might even have helped push Turkey into this direction.

The protests illustrate a divide within Turkey that is reminiscent of how Samuel Huntington defined Turkey as a torn country in his seminal work The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (The Free Press, London 2002). Huntington’s 1996 work, based on his famous 1993 article, is best interpreted in light of the ending of the Cold War, as to make sense of the new balance of power in the world.

In short, Huntington distinguishes nine separate civilizations, each centered on their respective core states. The core states function as cultural examples to the other states of their respective civilization, while they also wield the most influence within their civilization. The other countries have accepted the leadership role of their core states.  Huntington further defines cleft states, countries in which major groups of inhabitants claim to belong to different civilizations, and torn states, which have a single dominant culture where the leaders wish to join another civilization (Huntington, p.139). The latter happened to Turkey during its secularization and westernization under Atatürk in the early twentieth century (pp.144-149).

One of the major problems of Huntington’s Islamic civilization is its lack of a core state. In its quest towards the west, Turkey has moved too far away from the other Islamic states to be accepted as such. Even so, Huntington acknowledges that Turkey has the potential to become a core state, if it abandons its focus on the west, with the warning that  “to do so it would have to reject Ataturk’s legacy more thoroughly than Russia has rejected Lenin’s.” (p.179)

Erdoğan’s reforms are the main cause of the riots. They are reforms that go against the ideals on which Atatürk founded the Republic of Turkey. Following Huntington’s reasoning, Erdoğan is proceeding by the book if his long term aim is to make Turkey a core state of an Islamic civilization. This is further substantiated by Turkey’s more assertive foreign policy and involvement in the Middle East, demonstrated by its stance towards southern neighbor Syria and Erdoğan’s more vocal criticism of Israel.

The continued rejection of membership of the European Union might even have helped push Turkey into this direction. Turkey’s unrest must then not only be seen as general opposition to its government, but as illustrating the country’s struggle between going east or west.

Yuri van Hoef is lecturer of International Relations and World Politics at the University of Groningen.

10 thoughts on “Turkey: A Country Torn Between Going East or West

  1. you are in reality a excellent webmaster. The website loading velocity is amazing. It sort of feels that you are doing any unique trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you have performed a fantastic job in this topic!|

  2. I’m гeally enjoying the design аnd layoսt of yoսr blߋg.
    It’s a very eɑsy on the eʏes ѡhich makes іt much more pleasant for
    me to come here and viskt more often. Did you hire out a developer to create your
    theme? Outstanding work!

  3. My partner and I stumbled over here from a differeent website andd thought I
    may as well check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you.
    Look forward to exploring your web page yet again.

  4. After going over a handful of the blog articles on your web site, I
    seriously appreciate your technique of blogging.
    I added it to my bookmark webpage list and will be
    checking back in the near future. Please check out my website as well and let me
    know your opinion.

  5. I’m amazed, I must say. Seldom do I come across a blog that’s equally educative and interesting, and without a doubt, you’ve
    hit the nail on the head. The problem is an issue that too
    few people are speaking intelligently about. I’m very
    happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something regarding this.

  6. Heya I’m not sure whether it’s me or your website but it is
    launching sluggish for me personally, I had to spend just like a few moments to
    load up on the other hand gmail operates perfectly for me.

    Around the other hand thank you for writing awesome
    blog post. I do believe it has already been honestly helpful to user
    who seem to click here. This one is fantastic what
    you have concluded and want to see a lot more awesome content from
    you. To get additional information from posts that you write-up,
    I actually have book-marked this web site.

  7. Can I just say what a relief to seek out somebody who truly is aware of what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know the way to bring a problem to gentle and make it important. Extra folks must learn this and understand this aspect of the story. I cant imagine youre no more standard since you positively have the gift.

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.